Difference between revisions of "Nondetermism"
From BP Wiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Setting up nondeterminism: | Setting up nondeterminism: | ||
* In BP, event selection is deteremined by the unique priority of each b-thread, and by the order of events in the requested event set. | * In BP, event selection is deteremined by the unique priority of each b-thread, and by the order of events in the requested event set. | ||
| − | * When the difference in priority of two b-threads is less than a given "epsilon" (a real number provided by the user), the two b-threads are considered of same priority. For example, to create 48 bthreads of the same priority, choose epsilon of 1.00 and create the set of these b-threads so that their priorities have the same whole part and differ only by fractional part. (e.g. priority values of 7.001 – 7.048). The value of "epsilon" is determined by | + | * When the difference in priority of two b-threads is less than a given "epsilon" (a real number provided by the user), the two b-threads are considered of same priority. For example, to create 48 bthreads of the same priority, choose epsilon of 1.00 and create the set of these b-threads so that their priorities have the same whole part and differ only by fractional part. (e.g. priority values of 7.001 – 7.048). The value of "epsilon" is determined by |
| − | . . . | + | . . . |
| − | * | + | * |
* In a given requested-events set, events that are in the same second level event set are considered of same priority . E.g. in the requested event set R={a, {b,c,d},{e,f,g}}. b,c,d are considered of the same priority, and e,f,g are considered of the same priority. | * In a given requested-events set, events that are in the same second level event set are considered of same priority . E.g. in the requested event set R={a, {b,c,d},{e,f,g}}. b,c,d are considered of the same priority, and e,f,g are considered of the same priority. | ||
| − | + | When executing in model-checking mode, nondetereministic event selection is performed according to the following algorithm : | |
| − | Scan b-threads in order of priority | + | |
| − | Scan the requested event set of each b-thread in event order (the set is enumerable. | + | * Scan b-threads in order of priority |
| − | When the first event that is requested and not blocked is found it is one alternative. | + | * Scan the requested event set of each b-thread in event order (the set is enumerable). |
| − | If | + | * When the first event that is requested and not blocked is found it is remembered as one alternative. |
| − | + | * If the selected event was in a second level event set (a set within a set), all its siblings in the same second level set that are not blocked are considered having the same priority, and are added as alternatives. | |
| − | Example | + | * If the event is in a first level of the requested event set, this event is the only one from this b-thread. |
| + | * After exploring all execution subtrees anchored at the alternatives from one b-thread go to the next b-thread of “same” priority as defined with epsilon, and repeat the above . At most one second-level set will be selected from the requested events of that b-thread, but not necessarily the first one. | ||
| + | * Example | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 4 August 2013
In common processing event selection in BP is deterministic. However, in some cases it is desired to specify nondetermistic choices - e.g., when simulating environment behavior using b-threads as part of model checking. The BPmc model checker explores all possible execution paths defined by this nondeterminism.
Setting up nondeterminism:
- In BP, event selection is deteremined by the unique priority of each b-thread, and by the order of events in the requested event set.
- When the difference in priority of two b-threads is less than a given "epsilon" (a real number provided by the user), the two b-threads are considered of same priority. For example, to create 48 bthreads of the same priority, choose epsilon of 1.00 and create the set of these b-threads so that their priorities have the same whole part and differ only by fractional part. (e.g. priority values of 7.001 – 7.048). The value of "epsilon" is determined by
. . .
- In a given requested-events set, events that are in the same second level event set are considered of same priority . E.g. in the requested event set R={a, {b,c,d},{e,f,g}}. b,c,d are considered of the same priority, and e,f,g are considered of the same priority.
When executing in model-checking mode, nondetereministic event selection is performed according to the following algorithm :
- Scan b-threads in order of priority
- Scan the requested event set of each b-thread in event order (the set is enumerable).
- When the first event that is requested and not blocked is found it is remembered as one alternative.
- If the selected event was in a second level event set (a set within a set), all its siblings in the same second level set that are not blocked are considered having the same priority, and are added as alternatives.
- If the event is in a first level of the requested event set, this event is the only one from this b-thread.
- After exploring all execution subtrees anchored at the alternatives from one b-thread go to the next b-thread of “same” priority as defined with epsilon, and repeat the above . At most one second-level set will be selected from the requested events of that b-thread, but not necessarily the first one.
- Example
